Enhancing the Common European Asylum System and Alternatives to Dublin.

Autor: Elspeth Guild, Cathryn Costello, Madeline Garlick, Violeta Moreno-Lax with the participation of Sergio Carrera
Ciudad: Bruselas
Editorial: Parlement européen. Etude pour la Commission LIBE.
Fecha: 16/07/2015
Comentario

Elspeth Guild, Cathryn Costello, Madeline Garlick, Violeta Moreno-Lax with the participation of Sergio Carrera.: Enhancing the Common European Asylum System and Alternatives to Dublin, Parlement européen. Etude pour la Commission LIBE, 2015. 

Abstract

  • Upon request by the LIBE committee, this study examines the reasons why the Dublin system of allocation of responsibility for asylum seekers does not work effectively from the viewpoint of Member States or asylum-seekers.
  • It argues that as long as it is based on the use of coercion against asylum seekers, it cannot serve as an effective tool to address existing imbalances in the allocation of responsibilities among Member States.
  • The EU isfaced with two substantial challenges:
    - first, how to prevent unsafe journeys and risks to the lives of people seeking international protection in the EU; and
    - secondly, how to organise the distribution of related responsibilities and costs among the Member States.
  • This study addresses these issues with recommendations aimed at resolving current practical, legal and policy problems (Texto completo).

Estudios monograficos publicados por el PE. LIBE:

Otros estudios de los autores de este trabajo:

Más datos sobre bibliografia (monografias y artículos):

Financiado por: Ministerio de Trabajo e Inmigración
Coordinado por: Universidad de León